tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20996339.post7592199354520657868..comments2008-11-15T15:43:40.741-08:00Mike Stoppelmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14716634794648347703noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20996339.post-46691229333417445672008-11-15T13:46:00.000-08:002008-11-15T13:46:00.000-08:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Fatimahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13921115379160900939noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20996339.post-60438456052378828752008-04-15T09:43:00.000-07:002008-04-15T09:43:00.000-07:00Congratulations! That makes good sense (pun intended).Lynnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10946407957964677726noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20996339.post-80619677489798800442008-04-13T23:13:00.000-07:002008-04-13T23:13:00.000-07:00But if they really want to do a "test," then wouldn't they want to not do a test which cold also jeopardize 40% of their revenue (in case their cut doesn't live up to expectations)?<BR/><BR/>That and the fact that showing google results on all of the important terms would also not be a random enough sample to see if they want to continue long term. Assuming that they aren't just using this as a bargaining chip, that is (which microsoft would hopefully see through, since it's unrealizable gain for them since the whole point of the offer is to combine the ad efforts).cchttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07355815517358524010noreply@blogger.com